Legal Opinion

Brown v. Woodring

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1959No. Civ. A. 6314PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN W. MURPHY, Chief Judge.

Defendant moves to transfer this diversity — wrongful death — action to the Eastern District of North Carolina, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1404(a).

§ 1404(a) provides: “For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.” The present action could have been brought — 28 U.S.C.A. § 1391(a) — and service obtained in the state or federal courts of North Carolina, see Leppard v. Jordan’s Truck Line, D.C. E.D.S.C.1953, 110 F.Supp. 811,…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. In the Matter of Emanuel JosephsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. B. J. McAdams, Inc. v. BoggsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Maier v. City of KetchikanAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Elite Parfums, Ltd. v. RiveraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  4. Grubs v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1960
  5. A. C. Samford, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API