Hoekman v. Nelson
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGilbertson, Justice
[¶ 1.] In this personal injury action plaintiff Alvin Hoekman (Hoekman) appeals the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant Federal Express Corp. (Federal Express), determining that while Federal Express owed a limited duty of care to him, Hoekman was contributorily negligent more than slight as a matter of law. We affirm on the basis that the duty of care of Federal Express in these circumstances extended only to ensure Hoek-man’s safe passage in front of the, Federal Express vehicle.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.2 On October 17, 1995, Hoekman was injured as he crossed South Burr…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Morgan v. BaldwinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- VerBouwens v. Hamm Wood ProductsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Millea v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- McGuire v. DEAN J. CURRYSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- DRD Enterprises, LLC v. FlickemaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Woods v. O'NeilMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Drd v. Aventure EstatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.