Legal Opinion

Hoekman v. Nelson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbertson, Justice

[¶ 1.] In this personal injury action plaintiff Alvin Hoekman (Hoekman) appeals the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant Federal Express Corp. (Federal Express), determining that while Federal Express owed a limited duty of care to him, Hoekman was contributorily negligent more than slight as a matter of law. We affirm on the basis that the duty of care of Federal Express in these circumstances extended only to ensure Hoek-man’s safe passage in front of the, Federal Express vehicle.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.2 On October 17, 1995, Hoekman was injured as he crossed South Burr…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Morgan v. BaldwinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. VerBouwens v. Hamm Wood ProductsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Millea v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. McGuire v. DEAN J. CURRYSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. DRD Enterprises, LLC v. FlickemaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Woods v. O'NeilMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  5. Drd v. Aventure EstatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API