Legal Opinion

VerBouwens v. Hamm Wood Products

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1983No. 13941PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

ACTION

On May 14, 1982, appellant VerBouwens filed a complaint against appellee Hamm Wood Products and The Maryland Casualty Company for injuries sustained in an industrial mishap. Discovery was conducted and summary judgment dismissing appellant’s claim was entered on July 26,1982. Appellant filed a notice of appeal to this Court on September 27, 1982. Maryland Casualty Company filed a motion to affirm, and on January 13, 1983, the motion was granted dismissing Maryland Casualty Company from this action. We affirm.

FACTS

On February 17, 1981, appellee Hamm Wood Products hired…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Ruple v. WeinaugSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Neal v. OliverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  4. Granflaten v. RohdeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Spivey v. BattagliaSupreme Court of Florida · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Ernst & Young, L.L.P. v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Reed Tool Co. v. CopelinTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Birklid v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1995

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API