Legal Opinion

Cannizzaro v. Neiman Marcus, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 20, 1997No. 4:96-cv-00934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SOLIS, District Judge.

Now before the Court are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs Motion for Continuance Under Rule 56(f) and Brief in Support of Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment, 1 and Reply Brief in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to Plaintiff’s Rule 56(f) Motion for Continuance. Based on the evidence before the Court and the authorities presented, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion(s) for Continuance and GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

/. THE FACTS

Plaintiff (“Cannizzaro”) was…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Martin v. Kroger Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
  2. Bennett v. Calabrian Chemicals Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2004
  3. Columbia Plaza Medical Center of Fort Worth Subsidiary, L.P. v. SzurekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Amoco Production Co. v. Hydroblast Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1999
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Methodist Hospitals of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API