Legal Opinion
Bennett v. Calabrian Chemicals Corp.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided June 9, 2004No. 1:03-cv-00238PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CRONE, District Judge.
Pending before the court is Defendant Calabrian Corporation’s (“Calabrian”) (incorrectly named as Calabrian Chemicals Corporation) Motion for Summary Judgment (# 14). Calabrian seeks summary judgment on Plaintiff Larry Bennett’s (“Bennett”) claims of employment discrimination and retaliation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12113, and Title 1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a. Having reviewed the pending motion, the submissions of the parties, the pleadings, and the applicable law, the court is of…
2Cases cited123 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Arteaga v. Brink's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Harville v. Texas A & M UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Cato v. FIRST FEDERAL COMMUNITY BANKDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2009
- Burns v. Air Liquide America, L.P.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- Chad Austgen v. Allied Barton Sec Svc, L.L.C., etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.