Legal Opinion

People v. Alford

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 2010No. C060251PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, J.

In this appeal pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 [158 Cal.Rptr. 839, 600 P.2d 1071], we solicited supplemental briefing to clarify the proper way to implement Penal Code section 654.

Broadly speaking, one branch of section 654 precludes multiple punishment when a criminal act or omission violates multiple penal provisions. We conclude that when a trial court determines that section 654 applies to a particular count, the trial court must impose sentence on that count and then stay execution of that sentence. There is no authority for a court to refrain…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. DelozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In re WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. People v. RelkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. People v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. People v. Villa-GomezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. People v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API