People v. Sanchez
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOORE, J.
A criminal defendant has a constitutional and statutory right to be present at sentencing. (People v. Robertson (1989) 48 Cal.3d 18, 60 [255 Cal.Rptr. 631, 767 P.2d 1109].) Defendant Rolando Esteban Sanchez contends he was denied his right to counsel and to be present at his resentencing hearing when the trial court resentenced him in his absence on remand after the federal district court ordered defendant’s conviction on count five vacated and the matter remanded for trial on count five for resentencing.
Defendant was convicted and sentenced on a number of felony convictions…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- In re Jackson CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. BaslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- People v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- People v. Keeton CA5California Court of Appeal · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.