Legal Opinion

People v. Pearson

California Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1986No. Crim. 24299PublishedCited by 187 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

This case raises the questions (1) whether a defendant may be convicted of both statutory sodomy and lewd conduct for the commission of a single act of sodomy and (2) whether the use of both such convictions *354to enhance future sentences would constitute impermissible double punishment.

Defendant committed an act of sodomy on each of two children. For each act he was convicted of two offenses: sodomy with a child under 14 (Pen. Code, § 286, subd. (c))1 and lewd conduct (§ 288, subd. (a)). The court imposed sentence for the lewd conduct convictions but stayed sentence on the sodomy…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. BeamonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by187 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. KaurishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API