Safeco Insurance Co. v. Westport Insurance Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge TAUBMAN.
Plaintiff, Safeco Insurance Company, appeals the summary judgment entered in favor of defendants, Horace Mann Insurance Company and Westport Insurance Corp., holding Safeco's claim for pro rata contribution of insurance benefits was time barred because it did not demand mandatory arbitration within the applicable one-year statute of limitations under the No-Fault Act. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
This case arises from a thirty-five-car chain reaction accident occurring on I-70 as a result of dense fog descending over the highway. Three of the vehicles…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cotter Corp. v. American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Zab, Inc. v. Berenergy Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Mileikowsky v. Tenet HealthsystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Sooper Credit Union v. Sholar Group Architects, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Gumina v. City of SterlingColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Safeco Insurance Co. v. Westport Insurance Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009