Legal Opinion
Sooper Credit Union v. Sholar Group Architects, P.C.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 13, 2005No. 04SC206PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
Petitioner seeks review of the court of appeals’ decision reversing the district court’s confirmation of the corrected arbitration award and reinstating the initial award. We reverse and remand.
Section 13-22-211, 5 C.R.S. (2003), empowers an arbitrator to clarify an award that is confusing due to an error, ambiguity, or general lack of clarity. In such a circumstance, an arbitrator may modify the award to make it clearer and thereby effectuate his or her intent. The statute does not require that-the confusion be evident on the face of the award or patently ambiguous, but an arbitrator may not…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Colorado Water Conservation Board v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics and Allied Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, Clc, Local 182b v. Excelsior Foundry CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- San Antonio Newspaper Guild Local No. 25, and American Newspaper Guild, Afl-Cio, Clc v. San Antonio Light Division and the Hearst CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- People v. YascavageSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- In re the Marriage of ChalatSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. FisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- Denver Publishing Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Holcomb v. Jan-Pro Cleaning Systems of Southern ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Fowler & Peth, Inc. v. ReganSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Jordan v. Maxim Healthcare ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.