Cotter Corp. v. American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez
This ease arose from a declaratory judgment action initiated by petitioner Cotter Corporation (“Cotter”), a uranium mill operator, against its insurance providers. Cotter seeks a determination that the various insurance policies issued by the respondent insurers required them to both defend Cotter in two tort actions and indemnify Cotter for resulting liability. In response, the insurers contend that the qualified pollution exclusion clauses contained in the policies precluded coverage. In Cotter Corp. v. American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Co., the court of appeals affirmed the district…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Technicon Electronics Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Hecla Mining Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Valley Forge Insurance v. Health Care Management Partners, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Lombard v. Colorado Outdoor Education Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- A.C. Excavating v. Yacht Club II Homeowners Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.