Legal Opinion

Doe v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 14, 2002No. 98-896CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HODGES, Judge.

This is a class action against the United States on behalf of current and former Department of Justice attorneys who seek overtime pay under the Federal Employees Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 5542, 5543, and 5545(e)(2) (FEPA).1 The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Sections 5542 and 5543 provide that government employees are entitled to premium pay or compensatory time for overtime work that is ordered or approved by authorized persons, with certain exceptions. Section 5545(c)(2) provides premium pay for administratively…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Samuel Gart v. Logitech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. B.F. Goodrich Company v. United States Filter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Demarini Sports, Inc. v. Worth, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. John Doe, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. John Doe, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Mercier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  4. Mercier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  5. Bishop v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API