Legal Opinion
Samuel Gart v. Logitech, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 26, 2001No. 00-1088PublishedCited by 222 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINN, Circuit Judge.
On cross motions for summary judgment, the United States District Court for the Central District of California (the “district court”) determined that Logitech, Inc. (“Logitech”) does not infringe claim 7 of Samuel Gart’s (“Gart”) U.S. Patent No. 4,862,165 (the “ '165 patent”) either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. Gart v. Logitech, Inc., No. CV 98-5957 CBM (C.D.Cal. Aug. 16, 1999) (“Gart 7”) (claim construction and literal infringement analysis); Gart v. Logitech, Inc., No. CV 98-5957 CBM (C.D.Cal. Oct. 23, 1999) (“Gart 77”) (infringement under the doctrine…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by222 opinions
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Ccs Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation and Its Division Life FitnessCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Amgen Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (Now Known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Cross Medical Products, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.