Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1999No. 67024-2PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

This case involves a determination of (1) whether the trial judge abused his discretion in concluding the jurors did not engage in misconduct by using a trial ex*22hibit to reenact the crime charged, and (2) whether a sentencing court can impose an exceptional sentence downward below the time specified under RCW 9.94A-.310(4) for a deadly weapon enhancement. We conclude the trial judge did not abuse his discretion by refusing to grant a new trial when the jurors used a trial exhibit to reenact the crime charged. We further conclude that the “Hard Time for Armed Crime” initiative, codified in RCW…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. Houston-SconiersWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  3. American Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTHWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. American Legion Post No. 149 v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. RecuencoWashington Supreme Court · 2008

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API