State v. Manussier
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
— Appellant George W. Manussier appeals his mandatory sentence of life imprisonment without possibility of parole under the "three strikes law” of RCW 9.94A.120(4) following his plea of "guilty” in the Pierce County Superior Court to second degree robbery. He challenges on various state and federal constitutional grounds the validity of the "three strikes law,” enacted by the Legislature in 1994 after approval of Initiative 593 by the people of Washington in 1993. We affirm.
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
The questions presented in this case are whether Initiative 593 (1) was adopted in violation of…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by218 opinions
- In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. CottonSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000
213 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.