Legal Opinion

State v. Recuenco

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2008No. 74964-7PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

180 P.3d 1276 (2008)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Arturo R. RECUENCO, Petitioner.

No. 74964-7.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued March 13, 2007.

Decided April 17, 2008.

Gregory Charles Link, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, for Appellant.

James Morrissey Whisman, King County Prosecutor's Office, Seattle, for Respondent.

James Elliot Lobsenz, Carney Badley Spellman, Seattle, Amicus Curiae for Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

C. JOHNSON, J.

¶ 1 This case asks us to determine whether Washington law requires a harmless error analysis where a sentencing factor, such…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. State v. Williams-WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. Williams-WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. SibertWashington Supreme Court · 2010

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API