Trump v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REYNOSO, J.
In this proceeding for a writ of prohibition, we are called upon to construe the statutory provisions governing mandatory judicial arbitration. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1141.10-1141.32; Cal. Rules of Court, rules 1600-1617.) Specifically, we must determine whether a postarbitration request for trial which is limited to certain issues presented by the action may be heard on limited issues or whether it must be heard on all issues. Under the narrow circumstance here presented, which we note deals with a compulsory cross-complaint, we conclude that such a request results in trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Alford v. PiernoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Kahn v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Stanley v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Lampley v. AlvaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
3Cited by14 opinions
- Christie-Lambert Van & Storage Co. v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Boyd v. Oscar Fisher Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Herbert Hawkins Realtors, Inc. v. MilheiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Wagy v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Baker v. SadickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.