Stanley v. Justice Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
The resolution of this appeal requires that we interpret the qualifying phrase “nearest or most accessible” as descriptive of the magistrate before whom one arrested for felony without a warrant must be taken “without unnecessary delay.” (Pen. Code, § 849, subd. (a).) Appellant 2 herein asserts that the qualifying phrase imposes essentially a geographic limitation. We conclude that such a literal interpretation of the phrase would create unmanageable discordance among various Penal Code provisions governing felony pretrial procedure. Consequently, we reject the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- County of Alameda v. KuchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.