Legal Opinion
Gamble v. Fradkin & Weber
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 13, 2012No. Civil No. JFM-11-1779PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff James Gamble (“Gamble”) brings this action against Defendant Fradkin & Weber, P.A. (“Fradkin & Weber”), a law firm that engages in the business of debt collection. Gamble alleges that in attempting to recover a debt from him, Fradkin & Weber violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and tortiously invaded his privacy by intruding upon his seclusion. Now pending before the court is Fradkin & Weber’s motion to dismiss the claims against it. Gamble opposed the motion to dismiss but Fradkin & Weber did not file a reply and the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Shirley Presley v. City of Charlottesville Rivanna Trails FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Stephen P. Turner v. J.V.D.B. & Associates, Inc., an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Simon v. FIA Card Services, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Beal v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2013
- Broadrick v. LVNV Funding LLC (In re Broadrick)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2015
- CRAWLEY v. CACH, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Drake v. Synchrony BankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.