Legal Opinion
Drake v. Synchrony Bank
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 11, 2023No. 1:19-cv-02134Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND REUBEN DRAKE, v. Civil Action No. CCB-19-2134 SYNCHRONY BANK, et al. MEMORANDUM Pro se plaintiff Reuben Drake filed an amended complaint alleging that Synchrony Bank violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the Maryland Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the Maryland Consumer Protection Act, and invaded his privacy by persistently calling his cell phone using automated systems. Synchrony moved to dismiss the amended complaint in part. The motion has been fully briefed and no oral argument is necessary. See Local Rule…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bizzie Walters v. Todd McMahenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States Ex Rel. Nathan v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Facebook, Inc. v. DuguidSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.