Legal Opinion · Dissent

Edgar Allen Steel Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 9, 1928No. 2969Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Bland, Judge:

I agree with all that has been said in this case by Presiding Judge Graham in his dissenting opinion, which was our position, substantially, in the case of Watson, Geach & Co. (Inc.) v. York Metal & Alloys Co., 14 Ct. Cust. Appls. 449, T. D. 42112. And, in addition, I wish to emphasize, as strongly as possible, that in a case of this character, where the court is confronted with a construction of a tariff provision which will lead to such a result as to be not within the reasonable intent of Congress, it is its most imperative duty to refuse to apply the words…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Watson v. York Metal & Alloys Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API