Jackson v. Continental Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Clare; Hart (Ray), J. Assumpsit by John Jackson, Jr., against the Continental Insurance Company on a policy of insurance. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
In 1916 plaintiff and one Jay Wyman entered into an arrangement whereby plaintiff was to furnish the money and Wyman was to buy hay at *379Clare, the profits to be divided. Under this arrangement plaintiff furnished some $3,500 which Wyman used in buying hay. The hay was stored in three buildings, one being in Clare and the other two in the country. On December 22d defendant issued to plaintiff its policy of insurance for $1,000 on the hay in the Clare warehouse for a period of one year. In the summer of 1917 plaintiff became insistent that the hay should be sold; he had been offered at one time…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Engel v. TateMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Messer v. DornbosMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Moore v. Royal Oak Lumber & Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. MooneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Oscar Daniels Co. v. City of Sault Ste. MarieMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wormley v. Grand Rapids Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Michigan Central Railroad v. MorganMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Eason v. Eason's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1930