Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Haynie v. Surplus Trading Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 27, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts).l"!

The Camp Pike Military Reservation lies within the boundaries of Pulaski County, Arkansas, and the principal question presented for decision by this appeal relates to the power of the State and its subordinate taxing agencies to levy and collect taxes pursuant to the State laws upon personal property situated within said military reservation.

Counsel for appellee seek to uphold the decree of the chancellor denying the right of the State and its subordinate agencies to levy and .collect such taxes upon the authority of Concessions Co. v. Morris (Wash.),…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Thomas v. GaySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Montana Catholic Missions v. Missoula CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Oelricks v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  4. Fulcher v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  5. Wagoner v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Surplus Trading Co. v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Young, Admin. v. G. L. Tarlton, Contractor, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. State Ex Rel. Board of County Commissioners v. BruceMontana Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API