Legal Opinion

State v. Henry

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided October 8, 2010No. A-10552, A-10578PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Both of the defendants in these consolidated appeals entered into plea agreements with the State to resolve the criminal charges pending against them. In each case, the plea agreement called for the defendant to receive a sentence that included a partially suspended term of imprisonment and a concomitant period of probation (following the defendant's service of the non-suspended portion of their sentence).1

In each case, the defendant served their non-suspended term of imprisonment and was released on probation. Later, each defendant violated their probation and was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Creech v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Ralston v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jason D. Ray v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State of Alaska v. Falealo Manuele PulusilaAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Jason D. Ray v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
  4. Silas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2018
  5. Jason D. Ray v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API