Foondle v. O'Brien
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAASSEN, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
William Foondle appeals the superior court's dismissal of his claims for legal malpractice against the public defenders who represented him in a criminal case. In dismissing Foondle's malpractice claims, the superior court relied on the public policy principle that © precludes criminally convicted plaintiffs from civil recovery based on the alleged negligence of their former defense counsel. We hold that the superior court's legal analysis was correct, and we affirm the judgment on that basis. We reject, as unsupported, Foondle's argument that the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bailey v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Peterson v. EkAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Shaw v. State, Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Kollodge v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Barry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rae v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Hooks v. Alaska USA Federal Credit UnionAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Gregory Marino v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2025
- Mark O'Hara Wright v. Andrew C. Graves, Esq.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2023
- Mark O'Hara Wright v. Andrew C. Graves, Esq.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2023