Cronce v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOLGER, Judge.
Christopher E. Cronce was convicted of assault in the second degree1 and assault in the third degree2 based on an incident when he attacked a man named Michael Wims. Superior Court Judge John E. Suddock imposed separate convictions and sentences for these two offenses. We conclude that these separate statutory violations must merge because, under the facts of this case, there was no difference in conduct or intent sufficient to warrant multiple punishments. We there*569fore vacate the separate conviction for third-degree assault.
Background
Cronce confronted Michael Wims as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whitton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Konrad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
- Allain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
- Mill v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Atkinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Ruiz-PachecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
- Starkweather v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Cronce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009
- State ex rel. Bremby v. Lindemuth, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.