Legal Opinion

Morris v. Mathews

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 21, 1986No. 84-1636PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

The question presented in this case is whether a state appellate court provided an adequate remedy for a violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment, by modifying a jeopardy-barred conviction to that of a lesser included offense that is not jeopardy barred.

I

On February 17,1978, respondent James Michael Mathews and Steven Daugherty robbed the Alexandria Bank in Alexandria, Ohio. After an automobile chase, the police finally surrounded the two men when they stopped at a farmhouse. Soon thereafter, the police heard shots fired inside the house, *239and respondent then emerged from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Price v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Rutledge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Jones v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. Gurmeet Singh DhinsaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. Stephens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API