Legal Opinion

Hertel v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 20, 1986No. 85-AB-1150; CA A37224PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Claimant seeks review of an Employment Appeals Board (EAB) decision denying him unemployment compensation on the ground that he voluntarily left work without good cause. ORS 657.176(2)(c).1 EAB concluded that he had not met his burden of showing that he had “no reasonable alternative but to leave work.” OAR 471-30-038(4).2 We reverse and remand for reconsideration.3

On April 4, 1985, claimant voluntarily quit work. The Employment Division, the referee and EAB denied claimant unemployment compensation on the ground that he had voluntarily left work without good cause. EAB made these findings of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henzel v. CameronOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Sothras v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Cascade Forest Products, Inc. v. Accident Prevention DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Guerra v. Real Estate DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Blivens v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Warkentin v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Hertel v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Glide Lumber Products Co. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API