Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. . English

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1942PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Is the plaintiffs’ cause of action, grounded on fraud, barred by the three-year statute of limitations ? The trial court answered in the affirmative, and we cannot say there was error in the ruling.

It is provided by C. S., 441, subsection 9, that in an action to avoid an instrument on the ground of fraud the suit shall be commenced within three years after the cause of action accrues, i.e., within three years after the discovery by the aggrieved party of the facts constituting fraud, or when such facts, in the exercise of proper diligence, should have been discovered. Hargett v. Lee, 206 N.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Collins v. Davis.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Wynn v. GrantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Wynn v. . GrantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Ewbank v. . LymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Hargett v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Morehead v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Ferris v. HaymoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  4. Shepherd v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Monteith v. WelchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API