Legal Opinion

Monteith v. Welch

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1956No. 36PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

Defendants insist that Franks, the trustee, was authorized to receive payment of the notes and to cancel the deed of trust; and hence they are protected by the cancellation entered of record.

The assertion that Franks, the trustee, was authorized to collect the notes and thereupon to cancel the deed of trust finds no support in the evidence or in law.

Plaintiff testified: “I never authorized Mr. Franks or any other person to collect any money represented by these notes secured by the deed of trust.”

The trustee never had possession of the notes or deed of trust. The notes were not due when Welch…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Collins v. Davis.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Fortune v. . HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Wynn v. GrantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Wynn v. . GrantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Insurance Co. v. . KnoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gregg v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. G.E. Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. GE CAPITAL MORTG. SERVICES v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. In Re PriceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1989
  5. Household Realty Corp. v. LambethCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API