Legal Opinion

Shepherd v. Shepherd

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1982No. 8112DC668PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff argues, by her sole assignment of error, that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiffs evidence. Defendant responds that plaintiffs cause of action in tort is barred by the statute of limitations for relief on the ground of fraud, and by the doctrine of unclean hands; that the parties voluntarily settled their differences via a binding accord and satisfaction or compromise; and that plaintiff failed to demonstrate that she suffered actual damages as a consequence of any wrongful conduct of defendant.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Crab Orchard Development CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Eubanks v. EubanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Peacock v. Barnes.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Hargett v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. WardDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. DarsieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Jennings v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Knight Publishing Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Honeycutt v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API