Legal Opinion

Saluda Motor Lines, Inc. v. Crouch

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 6, 1989No. 1409PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Judge:

Saluda Motor Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant (Motor Lines) commenced this action against Jean E. Crouch, Defendant-Respondent (Crouch) charging Crouch with trespassing on land over which Motor Lines alleges it has a right-of-way for the purpose of operating a railroad. Crouch answered the complaint alleging that the easement for railroad purposes had been abandoned. The trial judge granted Crouch a summary judgment holding that such easement as the railroad company and Motor Lines claim had been aban doned. In so ruling the judge held as permitted under Rule 56 of the South…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Witt v. PooleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  2. BILLINGS v. McDanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  3. Southern Silica Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. HoeferSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carolina Plating Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. James v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Faulkenberry v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API