Legal Opinion

Witt v. Poole

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 1, 1936No. 14388PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fishburne.

The complaint in this action alleges, among other things, that Michael A. Witt died intestate on the fourth day of January, 1911, and left surviving him as his sole heirs at law his widow, Lilla E. Witt, and four children, all of whom are now adults. This action was brought by the widow and children against the defendant for damages, based upon the defendant’s alleged trespass and invasion of the rights of plaintiffs of, in and to, “a right to pond and dam and to a mill yard and mill privilege on all that certain piece, parcel or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New England Structural Co. v. Everett Distilling Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Lorick & Lowrance v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  3. Southern Railway-Carolina Division v. HowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carolina Land Company, Inc. v. BlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  2. Hatcher v. ChesnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Conway v. CITY OF GREENVILLE, SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  4. BILLINGS v. McDanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  5. Holly Hill Lumber Co., Inc. v. GroomsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API