Legal Opinion

Faulkenberry v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 29, 2002No. 25454PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Justice:

This is a property dispute concerning ownership of a 200' wide strip of land between Monticello Road and the Broad River in Columbia, upon which Appellant, Norfolk Southern Railway Co. (Railroad) operates its railroad. The circuit court ruled the property in question is owned by Respondent, J. Larry Faulkenberry. We affirm.

FACTS

There is no dispute as to the underlying facts in this matter. Railroad’s track bisects Faulkenberry’s 200 acre piece of property, leaving approximately 97 acres on the western side of the tracks, which abut the Broad River. Railroad seeks to prevent…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Eldridge v. City of GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Southern Ry. v. BeaudrotSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  4. Ragsdale v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  5. Harman v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goldman v. RBC, INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. James v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Paine Gayle Properties, LLC v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API