Legal Opinion
Enfinger v. International Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 29, 1984No. 41070PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gregory, Justice.
We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Enfinger v. Intl. Indent. Co., 170 Ga. App. 443 (317 SE2d 841) (1984). The issue for our determination is whether OCGA § 33-34-5 (c) may be utilized to “cure” noncompliance with the signature requirements of OCGA § 33-34-5 (b). We answer this question in the negative and reverse.
On August 26, 1980, appellant Enfinger applied for automobile liability insurance with appellee International Indemnity Company (IIC). It is undisputed that the policy application form executed by Enfinger did not comply with the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Flewellen v. Atlanta Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Wiard v. Phoenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Government Employees Insurance v. MooneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Stafford v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Wilson v. Board of Regents of the University SystemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- City of Roswell v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- International Indemnity Co. v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Ransom v. RansomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Parker v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.