Legal Opinion
In the MATTER OF the Application for Licensure of Nadeen GRIEPENTROG
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 12, 2016No. A16-90PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JESSON, Judge
Relator challenges an order denying her application for a license as a body-art technician, arguing that the supervision requirement in the body-art licensing statute, Minnesota Statutes section 146B.03, which requires supervision by a licensed Minnesota body-art technician, is unconstitutional. Because the statutory requirement does not unlawfully delegate legislative power to set licensing standards to private body-art technicians, does not violate equal-protection rights by intentionally discriminating against out-of-state technicians, and does not violate the Dormant…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Conn v. GabbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dede v. Rushmore National Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Superior Glass, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Minn. Chamber Commerce v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019