Legal Opinion
Conn v. Gabbert
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 5, 1999No. 97-1802PublishedCited by 796 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
We granted certiorari in this case, 525 U. S. 809 (1998), to decide whether a prosecutor violates an attorney’s Fourteenth Amendment right to practice his profession when the prosecutor causes the attorney to be searched at the same time his client is testifying before a grand jury. We eon-*288elude that such conduct by a prosecutor does not violate an attorney’s Fourteenth Amendment right to practice his profession.
This case arises out of the the “Menendez Brothers,” Lyle and Erik Menendez, for the murder of their parents. Petitioners David Corn and Carol Najera are Los Angeles County Deputy…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by796 opinions
- Keith A. Hill v. Borough of Kutztown and Gennaro Marino, Mayor of Kutztown, in His Individual and Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Kowalski v. TesmerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Roy Richard Dittman v. State of California State and Consumer Affairs Agency Medical Board of California Acupuncture Committee and Marilyn NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- White v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- White v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
791 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.