Mable Cleary Trust v. Edward-Marlah Muzyl Trust
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSmolensk, J.
At issue in this case is the right to develop certain mineral interests; specifically, the right to gas exploration and development in a residential subdivision. Plaintiff, the Mable Cleary Trust, owns three lots in the subdivision and brought suit against defendants Dale Smith, William Muzyl, the EdwardMarlah Muzyl Trust, Thomas and Susan Tomkow, and Paxton Resources alleging that the mineral development violated the subdivision’s restrictive covenants. The trial court granted defendants’ motions for summary disposition and plaintiff appeals as of right. We affirm in part, reverse in part,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Terrien v. ZwitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Burkhardt v. BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- MacOmb County Prosecutor v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Titan Insurance Company v. HytenMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- Alfieri v. BertorelliMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Hiner v. MojicaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Roberts v. SaffellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- City of Huntington Woods v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.