United States v. Sponenbarger
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
Respondent sued the United States under the Tucker Act, 1 alleging that the Mississippi Flood Control Act of 1928 2 and construction contemplated by that Act involved an “intentional, additional, occasional flooding, damaging and destroying” of her land located in Desha County, Arkansas. She maintained that her property had thus been taken for a public use for which the Government. is required to pay just compensation by the Fifth Amendment. 3 In addition, she asserted a statutory right of recovery under the Act itself. After full hearing, judgment for the Government was entered in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by145 opinions
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Oklahoma Ex Rel. Phillips v. Guy F. Atkinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.