Legal Opinion
State v. Davis
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 18, 1992No. 60039PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Krupansky, Judge.
The state of Ohio appeals from an order of the trial court granting defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. The relevant facts follow.
Defendant, Jeffrey D. Davis, and two others, Lavender and Brown, were indicted by the Cuyahoga County Grand Jury on a three-count indictment, viz., count one, R.C. 2925.03, drug law, possession of cocaine in an amount equal to or exceeding the bulk amount; count two, R.C. 2925.03, drug law, preparation of cocaine for shipment or distribution; and count three, R.C. 2923.24, possession of criminal tools. All the charges arose out of an incident…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CrouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- State v. MuslehOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Alley v. BettencourtOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. CampanaOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. RosemondOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.