Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Crouse

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1999PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, J.:

¶ 1 In this appeal, Appellant, Raymond Lee Crouse, asks us to determine whether a “protective sweep” of a private residence, executed by state police in connection with a valid arrest warrant, violates Article 1, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. We hold that a “protective sweep,” as defined in Maryland v. Buie, 494 U.S. 325, 110 S.Ct. 1093, 108 L.Ed.2d 276 (1990), in connection with the execution of a valid arrest warrant is permissible under the Constitution of this Commonwealth. Accordingly, we affirm Appellant’s judgment of sentence.

¶ 2 The facts and procedural history…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. BaskingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API