Commonwealth v. Crouse
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, J.:
¶ 1 In this appeal, Appellant, Raymond Lee Crouse, asks us to determine whether a “protective sweep” of a private residence, executed by state police in connection with a valid arrest warrant, violates Article 1, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. We hold that a “protective sweep,” as defined in Maryland v. Buie, 494 U.S. 325, 110 S.Ct. 1093, 108 L.Ed.2d 276 (1990), in connection with the execution of a valid arrest warrant is permissible under the Constitution of this Commonwealth. Accordingly, we affirm Appellant’s judgment of sentence.
¶ 2 The facts and procedural history…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Jones v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. BaskingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.