Legal Opinion

Alley v. Bettencourt

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 10, 1999No. Case No. 98CA626PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kline, Presiding Judge.

Donald Alley, appellant, filed an action in the Pike County Court of Common Pleas, alleging that Officer George Bettencourt, Officer Greg Ford, and Officer Gary Siders (“the officers”), appellees, violated his federal civil rights, pursuant to Section 1983, Title 42, U.S.Code, and committed tortious acts under state law. The officers filed for summary judgment, asserting that the doctrines of qualified and sovereign immunity barred Alley’s claims. The court entered summary judgment for the officers.

On appeal, Alley asserts that the trial court erred in granting the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Essex Hayward v. Cleveland Clinic Found.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Morrison v. Horseshoe CasinoOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State v. HahnOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. McKee v. McCann, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2017
  5. McKee v. McCannOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API