Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Howard University
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 13, 2008No. 06-CV-916PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Associate Judge:
Tomika Hamilton and Jonathan Hamilton allege that Howard University Hospital and Mark Furline took adverse employment actions against their late mother, De’Borah Hamilton, for discriminatory reasons or in retaliation for opposing unlawful discrimination. 1 They also claim that the defendants violated their mother’s rights under the District of Columbia Family and Medical Leave Act. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants. We affirm.
I. Background
Our recent decision in Furline v. Morrison, 953 A.2d 344 (D.C.2008), issued after this case was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Brown, Regina C. v. Brody, Kenneth D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Schuler v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLPCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Walter Blair, II v. DC & Thaddeus Modlin, Jr.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Lacek v. Washington Hospital Center Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Francis v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Gomez v. Independence Management of Delaware, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.