Legal Opinion

Shahood v. Cavin

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1957No. Civ. 22613PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Appeal from judgment for plaintiff for $3,410.15 and costs. Appellant’s first point is that the court erred in overruling a demurrer to the first amended complaint. Appellant argues that that complaint, labeled conversion, does not state a cause of action because the subject matter is money and mere money is not susceptible of conversion. We agree that the complaint does not allege a conversion but hold that the demurrer was properly overruled, disregarding in the process the faulty conclusion of the pleader.

The complaint in summary alleges the following. Plaintiff Debee K. Shahood is and was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Haigler v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Erreca v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Brix v. Peoples Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Olschewski v. HudsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Los Angeles Drug Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Belford Trucking Co. v. ZagarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  2. Chicago Title Ins. Co. v. EllisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  3. Futch v. HeadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Montgomery v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Warm Springs Properties, Inc. v. Andora Villa, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API