Legal Opinion
Olschewski v. Hudson
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 5, 1927No. Docket No. 6064PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered against plaintiff for failure to amend after the sustaining of a demurrer on the ground that the complaint failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The effect of the challenged ruling upon the demurrer was to hold that an action for conversion does not lie for the alleged appropriation and sale by an agent of a laundry route.. Plaintiff is trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of the Eagle Laundry Company, a bankrupt corporation. Defendant is the executor of the estate of James T. Murphy, deceased.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Empire Steam Laundry v. LozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Payne v. ElliotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- New Method Laundry Co. v. MacCannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Ralston v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Boehm v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Kremen v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Kremen v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Roth Drug, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Vernon Chappell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Thompson v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.