Legal Opinion

Webber v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided June 15, 2000No. 03-99-00225-CRPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL E.F. DALLY, Justice (Retired).

Appellant Dawn E. Webber1 was convicted of promoting an obscene device. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 43.23(c)(1) (West 1994). The jury assessed appellant’s punishment at confinement in the county jail for thirty days and a fine of $4,000.

On appeal, appellant asserts that the evidence does not support the jury’s verdict; that the statute under which she was convicted is unconstitutional; and that the trial court erred in charging the jury, in admitting inadmissible evidence, and in allowing improper jury argument. We will affirm the judgment.

Appellant was…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Leday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Arline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Huizar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Hartson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  2. Sims v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  3. Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  4. Prewitt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  5. Lomax v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API