National Labor Relations Board v. Triple C Maintenance, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of the Decision and Order it issued to Respondent Triple C Maintenance, Inc., on October 30, 1998, finding that Triple C is not free to attack a collective bargaining agreement on the basis of a claim of lack of majority support after more than six months had elapsed from the time the agreement was entered into and that Triple C violated § 8(a)(1) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act [NLRA or Act]. International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers Local Union 64 [Union]…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Allentown MacK Sales & Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Local Lodge No. 1424, International Ass'n of MacHinists v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- National Labor Relations Board v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nova Plumbing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Carpenters Health and Welfare v. Management Resource Systems InCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airlines Division v. Allegiant Air, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n, Local Union No. 2 v. McElroy's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Iron Workers Tri-State Welfare Plan v. Carter Construction, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.