Legal Opinion
Iron Workers Tri-State Welfare Plan v. Carter Construction, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 18, 2008No. 06 C 0580PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: CARTER CONSTRUCTION, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JEFFREY COLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff has sued Carter Construction under Section 301 of the Taft-Hartley Act (also known as the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”)) and Section 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). See generally Sullivan v. William A. Randolph, Inc., 504 F.3d 665 (7th Cir.2007)(Posner, J.). The complaint charged that Carter Construction breached a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) that required it, among many things, to…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carpenters Health and Welfare v. Management Resource Systems InCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, AFL-CIO v. HoganDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025