Legal Opinion
Matter of Kindt
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 16, 1996No. C9-95-1622PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
This matter involves a determination that Keith Kindt is financially ineligible for medical assistance (MA) due to the availability of trust assets. On appeal, Keith Kindt’s former spouse and guardian, Kim Kindt (Kindt), argues the Commissioner of Human Services erred as a matter of law in concluding (1) the county’s benefit termination letter complied with the notice requirements of the Due Process Clause, and (2) Keith Kindt’s trust is an available asset for purposes of determining MA eligibility.
FACTS
On August 6, 1987, while watching a church-sponsored softball game in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Federal Trade Commission v. National Lead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Forsyth v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- In Re Estate of TurnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Himes v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ramey v. ReinertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Cohen v. Commissioner of the Division of Medical AssistanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Miller v. State Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Cook v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Johnson v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.