Legal Opinion

Ramey v. Reinertson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 4, 2001No. 00-1121, 00-1143PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires our examination of the Social Security Act (“Act”), in particular those provisions relating to the Medicaid program, established in 1965, see 42 U.S.C. § 1396a. We recognize, as have other courts, that “[t]he Social Security Act is among the most intricate ever drafted by Congress. Its Byzantine construction, as Judge Friendly has observed, makes the Act ‘almost unintelligible to the uninitiated.’ ” Schweiker v. Gray Panthers, 453 U.S. 34, 43, 101 S.Ct. 2633, 69 L.Ed.2d 460 (1981) (hereinafter Gray Panthers) (quoting Friedman v. Berger, 547 F.2d 724,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Brenda M. White, for Stanley A. Smith v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Schweiker v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Herweg v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Ruth Friedman v. Stephen Berger, Individually and as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Newbold v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Carver v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  3. Jaramillo v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  4. HOBBS EX. REL. HOBBS v. ZendermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  5. Knuutila v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2015

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API